1. Etiology
In surgical practice, acute intraperitoneal hypertension is commonly seen in severe intra-abdominal infections accompanied by septic shock, such as acute peritonitis, acute pancreatitis, and acute intestinal obstruction, severe abdominal trauma, rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute intra-abdominal hemorrhage or retroperitoneal hematoma, and postoperative hemorrhagic shock or massive bleeding in the hepatic retroperitoneal area after packing for hemostasis. After sufficient fluid resuscitation, there is acute progressive visceral edema, laparoscopic surgery under pneumoperitoneum, and inflation to counteract shock.
Application, after liver transplantation, complex abdominal vascular surgery, and postoperative positive pressure mechanical ventilation, etc.
1. Hemorrhagic shock:
(1) Abdominal trauma: Overseas reports indicate that severe abdominal trauma is the most common cause of this disease. Behrman (1998) reported 222 cases of hemorrhagic shock, massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and pancreatic injury, with fluid resuscitation ranging from 5,800 to 12,000 ml, blood transfusion of 800 to 5,000 ml, and 3 cases developed ACS.
(2) No abdominal trauma: Ivy (1999) reported 3 cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to extensive burns (>70%) with fluid intake exceeding 20,000 ml. Therefore, it is believed that in cases of extensive burns with massive fluid input, hypertension in the airways, oliguria, or anuria should raise suspicion for ACS. Maxwell (1999) reported 1216 cases of hemorrhagic shock, including 6 without a history of abdominal trauma, approximately 2/6 developed ACS, and the fluid intake was 19,000 ± 5,000 ml. The author warned to be vigilant about ACS with fluid intake exceeding 10,000 ml.
Severe abdominal trauma with hemorrhagic shock or traumatic hypovolemic shock presenting with systemic capillary permeability changes after fluid expansion, progressive peritoneal and visceral edema, and marked intestinal edema, increased volume, and significant intussusception above the incision plane, which cannot be retracted, should be initially considered as abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). In such cases, if the abdominal wall incision is forcibly closed, it will lead to a rapid increase in intraperitoneal pressure, followed by deterioration of respiration and circulation after leaving the operating room, oliguria, and eventually anuria. Most patients die within 10 or more hours after surgery, and this condition is often misdiagnosed as multiple organ failure syndrome.
2. Infection shock:After fluid expansion, most of the reported cases abroad are severe abdominal trauma with hemorrhagic shock leading to ACS after adequate fluid resuscitation. The difference is that severe pancreatitis with acute suppurative cholangitis is rare in Western Europe and North America, but it is a common disease causing ACS in China. In such cases, because there is an existing infectious systemic inflammatory response, treatment is difficult, and the mortality rate is much higher than that of hemorrhagic shock.
Abdominal compartment syndrome often occurs due to the combined effects of various factors causing a sharp increase in intra-abdominal pressure. A typical clinical example is severe abdominal infection or trauma itself causing edema and a significant increase in volume of abdominal visceral organs. At this time, it is often accompanied by hypovolemia, and the implementation of adequate fluid resuscitation leads to progressive edema of the peritoneum and visceral organs; and due to low blood perfusion, visceral ischemia-reperfusion injury after resuscitation can further worsen edema; it can also be exacerbated by dressing packing for hemostasis, mesenteric vein obstruction, or temporary portal vein occlusion. During trauma, shock, severe pancreatitis, severe peritonitis, or major surgery, the body may develop severe ISIR, resulting in a large amount of extracellular fluid entering the intracellular space or tissue spaces, causing a third space effect or fluid retention, with fluid therapy showing a significant positive balance, that is, the input volume far exceeds the output volume. At this time, only adequate input of balanced fluid can offset the positive balance, maintain effective circulating blood volume, and avoid blood concentration, otherwise, there will be a decrease in return blood volume, an increase in heart rate, a decrease in cardiac output, an increase in HCT, and hypotension. In the above situations, peritoneal and visceral edema and abdominal effusion have become inevitable. From the perspective of maintaining effective circulating blood volume, the fluid volume at this time is not too much, and the severe edema is only the adverse effect of ISIR, and it cannot be used to negate the necessity of fluid resuscitation. This fluid leakage in the circulation is temporary. When ISIR is reduced and capillary permeability returns, the excessive retained extracellular fluid is reabsorbed, the fluid positive balance turns into a negative balance, and edema quickly subsides.
2. Pathogenesis
When the peritoneum and visceral edema, and abdominal effusion cause acute abdominal compartment syndrome due to a sharp increase in intra-abdominal pressure, it can damage the physiological function of abdominal and systemic organs, leading to organ dysfunction and circulatory failure.
1. Increase in abdominal wall tension:When the intra-abdominal pressure increases, the tension of the abdominal wall increases, which can lead to abdominal distension and abdominal wall tension in severe cases. At this time, Doppler ultrasound examination may find a decrease in blood flow in the rectus sheath muscle, and if the abdominal cavity is closed forcibly after laparotomy, the incidence of incisional infection and incisional dehiscence is high. The dV/dP (volume/pressure) curve of the abdominal cavity is not linear, but rises abruptly like the oxygen dissociation curve, and after reaching a certain limit, even a small increase in the abdominal content is enough to cause a significant increase in intra-abdominal pressure; conversely, partial decompression can significantly reduce abdominal hypertension.
2. Tachycardia, decreased cardiac output:Increased intraperitoneal pressure significantly reduces stroke output, and cardiac output also decreases accordingly. During laparoscopic surgery, an intraperitoneal pressure as low as 1.33-2.00 kPa (10-15 mmHg) can produce adverse reactions. The reasons for the decrease in cardiac output (and stroke output) include reduced venous return, increased left ventricular filling pressure due to increased thoracic pressure, decreased myocardial compliance, and increased systemic vascular resistance. The reduction in venous return is mainly caused by a decrease in the pressure gradient between the postcapillary venous pressure and the central venous pressure, reduced blood return to the inferior vena cava, functional stenosis or mechanical compression of the inferior vena cava at the diaphragmatic location after filling and止血 due to severe lateral injury of the great vein of the liver, and increased thoracic pressure, etc. At this time, the pressures such as femoral venous pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and right atrial pressure all increase proportionally with the intraperitoneal pressure.
Tachycardia is the first cardiovascular response to increased intracavitary pressure, attempting to compensate for the decrease in stroke output to maintain cardiac output. Clearly, if tachycardia is not sufficient to compensate for the decreased stroke output, cardiac output will drop sharply, and circulatory failure will follow.
3. Increased thoracic pressure and decreased lung compliance:Increased intraperitoneal pressure raises and reduces the amplitude of movement of both diaphragmatic muscles, leading to a decrease in thoracic cavity volume and compliance, and an increase in thoracic pressure. On one hand, the increase in thoracic pressure restricts lung expansion, reduces lung compliance, resulting in increased peak airway pressure during mechanical ventilation, reduced alveolar ventilation volume, and reduced functional residual capacity. On the other hand, it increases pulmonary vascular resistance, causing an abnormal ventilation/perfusion ratio, leading to hypoxemia, hypercapnia, and acidosis. When supporting ventilation with a respirator, a higher pressure is needed to input sufficient tidal volume; if the increased intraperitoneal pressure is not relieved in time, mechanical ventilation will continue to increase thoracic pressure, and the above changes will further worsen.
4. Decreased renal blood flow:The most common manifestation of increased intraperitoneal pressure is oliguria. Doty (1999) reported that when the intraperitoneal pressure reaches 1.33 kPa (10 mmHg), the urine volume begins to decrease; at 2.00 kPa (15 mmHg), the average urine volume can decrease by 50%; at 2.67-3.33 kPa (20-25 mmHg), significant oliguria occurs; at 5.33 kPa (40 mmHg), anuria occurs, and the urine volume recovers after 1 hour of decompression. The decrease in urine volume during increased intraperitoneal pressure is caused by multiple factors, including reduced perfusion in the superficial cortex of the kidney, reduced renal blood flow, obstruction of renal vascular outflow due to compression of the renal veins, increased renal vascular resistance, decreased glomerular filtration rate, increased renin activity, and increased aldosterone levels. These factors are all caused by direct compression of abdominal hypertension, but the possibility of post-renal obstruction due to compression of the ureters does not exist.
Experimental studies have proven that after the increase of intraperitoneal pressure, the relief of abdominal hypertension does not immediately lead to polyuria, but rather the decrease in urine volume begins to reverse after about 60 minutes, indicating that the mechanical compression of abdominal hypertension is not the only cause of oliguria. Oliguria is related to the action of aldosterone and ADH after the increase of intraperitoneal pressure.
5. Decreased blood perfusion of abdominal organs:When intraperitoneal pressure increases, the blood flow of the hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic microcirculation decreases progressively. The changes in hepatic artery blood flow are earlier and more severe than those in portal vein blood flow; the blood flow of mesenteric artery and intestinal mucosal blood flow, as well as the perfusion of the gastroduodenal, pancreatic, and splenic arteries, all decrease. In summary, the blood perfusion of all abdominal organs except the adrenal gland decreases. These changes can exceed the result of decreased cardiac output and can also appear when intraperitoneal pressure increases while cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance remain normal.
Abdominal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites can cause increased hepatic venous pressure, further increased hepatic venous wedge pressure and paraaortic blood flow (gastroesophageal collateral blood flow index); conversely, when intraperitoneal pressure decreases. However, whether increased intraperitoneal pressure can cause esophageal variceal rupture and bleeding is still controversial.