Firstly, maternal blood determination
1. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate:
It is a non-specific method to check for infection. Any infection is accompanied by an acceleration of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, including autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). During normal pregnancy, erythrocyte sedimentation rate will also accelerate. If it is greater than 60mm/h, the sensitivity for diagnosing amniotic cavity infection syndrome is 65%, and the specificity is 100%. Due to the poor sensitivity of erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diagnosing amniotic cavity infection syndrome, it limits its clinical application.
2. White blood cell count:
Leukocyte elevation is the gold standard for infection, but it lacks specificity. As a diagnostic method for amniotic cavity infection syndrome, the positive predictive value or negative predictive value is 40% to 75% and 52% to 89% respectively. As for how much leukocytes should increase to diagnose amniotic cavity infection syndrome, it is indeterminate. Leukocytes have a high specificity for diagnosing obvious infections, but their sensitivity and positive predictive value are low for histological chorioamnionitis, simple amniotic fluid culture positivity, and mild clinical infections.
3. Maternal blood C-reactive protein (CRP):
CRP is a reaction result of the body after infection, produced by the liver, and is also non-specific, which is induced by IL-6. Currently, many studies evaluate the value of CRP in diagnosing asymptomatic intrauterine infection, but the positive predictive value and negative predictive value vary greatly among researchers (40% to 90%). False elevation may occur when uterine contractions exceed 6 hours or when other infectious diseases are present. However, if there is a significant increase, or if it starts low and then increases, it has certain diagnostic value. If the increase is more than 30%, it has a significant predictive value for intrauterine infection. Studies have shown that if CRP increases 12 hours before delivery, the positive predictive value for predicting intrauterine infection can reach 100%. The increase in CRP is not only related to intrauterine infection but also has a certain correlation with neonatal infection. In general, CRP is not very sensitive, which limits its clinical application.
4. Detection of cytokines:
The value of IL-6 in the diagnosis of amniotic fluid infection syndrome, many scholars have tried to detect cytokines in maternal blood to diagnose amniotic fluid infection syndrome. Lewis et al. detected the level of IL-6 in the blood of 57 pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes at 24 to 35 weeks of gestation before delivery. In 35 cases, the level of IL-6 was elevated, and in 27 cases, at least one complication in newborns occurred (including neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, neonatal sepsis, and congenital pneumonia). Among them, 24 cases had an IL-6 level higher than normal, and among the 30 cases without neonatal complications, only 11 had an IL-6 level higher than normal (OR=13.8, 95% CI, 2.93-74.7). Among the 13 pregnant women with neonatal complications who used corticosteroids before delivery, 10 had an IL-6 level higher than normal. Among the 32 pregnant women with amniotic fluid infection syndrome, 24 (75%) had an IL-6 level higher than normal, and among the 25 pregnant women without amniotic fluid infection syndrome, only 11 (44%) had an IL-6 level higher than normal (P≤0.03, OR 3.82, 95% CI, 1.09-13.0). Murtha found that when IL-6>8ng/L (8pg/ml), amniotic fluid infection can be diagnosed [positive predictive value (PPV)=96%, negative predictive value (NPV)=95%]. As a cytokine, IL-6 has high specificity in the diagnosis of infectious diseases and is released early in the inflammatory process. Additionally, due to the convenience of specimen collection, it is more convenient for clinical use. However, further prospective studies are needed to assess its value as a diagnostic tool for amniotic fluid infection syndrome.
Secondly, amniotic fluid examination
Amniocentesis is often used as a diagnostic method for amniotic fluid infection syndrome. Currently, the gold standard for the diagnosis of amniotic fluid infection syndrome is amniotic fluid culture, but its drawback is that the results take a long time to come out. In cases of premature rupture of membranes, nearly 80% of those with positive amniotic fluid cultures will develop obvious clinical infections, while only 10% of those with negative cultures will develop obvious clinical infections. Therefore, when diagnosing neonatal infections and clinical chorioamnionitis, its positive predictive value (PPV) is 67%, and its negative predictive value (NPV) is 95%. Amniotic fluid culture cannot clearly determine the site of infection, and this method has limited diagnostic value for mycoplasma and chlamydia infections.
1. Gram staining examination of amniotic fluid:
Gram staining of amniotic fluid smears is an ancient and widely used method due to its simple and convenient operation, especially suitable for those with ruptured membranes. The smear is used to find white blood cells and bacteria, both of which suggest the presence of amniotic cavity infection syndrome. The sensitivity of this examination method is 23% to 60%, and the specificity is 76% to 100%. The negative predictive value can reach 63% to 100%. Therefore, the value of this examination lies in the fact that if the examination is negative, it can basically exclude the presence of intrauterine infection. However, for those without ruptured membranes, amniocentesis is required, which limits its clinical application.
2. Measurement of glucose concentration in amniotic fluid:
Many studies believe that low glucose concentration in amniotic fluid is one of the manifestations of amniotic cavity infection syndrome. Gauthier tested the glucose concentration in amniotic fluid of 91 pregnant women and found that the concentration of amniotic fluid glucose
3. Other examinations:
The white blood cell count in amniotic fluid smears, with a count of 20×106/L (20/mm3) or more as the diagnostic criterion, results in a sensitivity of 80% for diagnosing intrauterine infection and a specificity of 90%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value are 96% and 85%, respectively. Detection of bacterial 16srDNA in amniotic fluid using PCR methods has a sensitivity of 100%, but this method requires special equipment and is time-consuming. The detection of catalase in amniotic fluid as a diagnostic method for intrauterine infection has a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 95% and 88%, respectively. This method is expected to be a better method for diagnosing amniotic cavity infection syndrome.
4. Cytokines:
Currently, the diagnosis of intrauterine infection focuses on the use of inflammatory cytokines. Cytokines are small molecular glycoproteins produced by different types of cells, especially those involved in immune responses. Studies have shown that the placenta can produce these inflammatory factors during intrauterine infection. The levels of two types of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6) in amniotic fluid are significantly increased during intrauterine infection, which has greater value in diagnosing amniotic cavity infection syndrome than amniotic fluid staining smears and detecting glucose concentration in amniotic fluid. Taking amniotic fluid IL-6 exceeding 7.9μg/L (7.9ng/ml) as the standard for diagnosing abnormal amniotic fluid culture, its positive predictive value and negative predictive value are 67% and 86%, respectively. In the case of preterm premature rupture of membranes with infection, IL-6 is significantly elevated. However, there is currently no clear standard value to distinguish the presence or absence of intrauterine infection. The value of IL-1β in umbilical cord blood of infected individuals is not significantly correlated with the length of latency, and the relationship between IL-1β and perinatal prognosis is not yet clear.
All the above-mentioned examination methods require the collection of amniotic fluid, and the success rate of amniocentesis is 45% to 97%, with certain complications. It is not recommended to use the above methods to diagnose amniotic cavity infection syndrome in all cases, but for cases with premature rupture of membranes, the above methods have significant advantages.
Some studies have detected the relationship between IL-8 in urine and intrauterine infection, finding that the positive predictive value and negative predictive value of elevated IL-8 in urine as a diagnostic indicator for amniotic cavity infection syndrome are 71% and 82% respectively. This method is simple and practical, but its value still needs to be further evaluated.
5. Enzymes:
Due to premature rupture of membranes or amniotic cavity infection syndrome, the extracellular matrix of amniotic cells has a common manifestation, that is, the degradation of extracellular matrix. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are the key enzymes in this process. The activity of this enzyme is enhanced in this pathological process. The inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) can covalently bind to MMPs, reducing their activity. The MMPs that degrade human amniotic membranes are MMP-2, and its corresponding inhibitor is TIMP-2. Maymon found that in cases of premature rupture of membranes or amniotic cavity infection syndrome, there is no significant correlation between the concentration of MMP-2 in amniotic fluid and gestational age; there is no significant difference in the concentration of MMP-2 in amniotic fluid between those with premature rupture of membranes and those with intact membranes. Conversely, compared with pregnant women who have not yet gone into labor, pregnant women with spontaneous labor have a significantly lower concentration of TIMP-2 in amniotic fluid. In cases with amniotic cavity infection syndrome accompanied by premature rupture of membranes, whether it is preterm or term delivery, the concentration of TIMP-2 in amniotic fluid is also significantly lower. Therefore, TIMP-2 in amniotic fluid can be used as a diagnostic indicator for amniotic cavity infection syndrome.
Three, fetal biophysical behavior detection for the diagnosis of amniotic cavity infection syndrome
After the onset of intrauterine infection, the level of prostaglandin (PG) in amniotic fluid increases, which can change the biological behavior of the fetus. At the same time, intrauterine infection can cause edema of the chorionic villus space and constriction of the umbilical vessels, thereby increasing the resistance of placental blood vessels, affecting the oxygen supply to the fetus, and subsequently changing the fetal heart rate and fetal movement. Through fetal heart monitoring and B-ultrasound examination, it is possible to determine whether there is intrauterine infection in the fetus.
1. Amniotic fluid measurement:
In cases of premature rupture of membranes, there is a correlation between amniotic fluid volume and amniotic cavity infection syndrome. Vintzileos divided premature rupture of membranes into three groups according to the size of amniotic fluid level, and found that those with oligohydramnios (referring to the maximum amniotic fluid level)
2. NST examination:
Using non-reactive NST as an index to predict amniotic cavity infection syndrome, the sensitivity for predicting positive amniotic fluid culture is 86%, and the specificity is 70%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value are 75% and 82% respectively. For predicting clinical and subclinical chorioamnionitis, the sensitivity and specificity are 78% and 86% respectively, and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value are 68% and 92% respectively. There are also reports that non-reactive NST cannot predict the occurrence of intrauterine infection and neonatal sepsis. However, overall, most research results suggest that non-reactive NST and tachycardia are significantly correlated with intrauterine infection. It is also believed that this test is best performed within 24 hours before delivery, when its predictive value is the highest. If the time exceeds 24 hours before delivery, its predictive value will significantly decrease. Currently, there is no evidence to show what relationship the pregnancy prognosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes has after the results of NST are processed.
3. Fetal biophysical profile (BPP):
It is a method of using ultrasound to observe the fetal activity in utero in real time, including five indicators: amniotic fluid volume (AF), fetal respiratory-like movement (FBM), fetal movement (FM), muscle tone (FT), and fetal heart rate (FHR) reactivity. BPP was initially used mainly for assessing the fetal intrauterine health status in high-risk pregnancies. After Vintzileos first used BPP scoring to diagnose intrauterine infection in 1985, many studies have conducted in-depth research on the value of BPP in diagnosing intrauterine infection. Gauthier performed BPP checks on 111 cases with premature rupture of membranes and found a close correlation between BPP scoring and intrauterine infection. Flemming found that low BPP scoring within 24 hours before delivery was closely correlated with histological chorioamnionitis. Vintzileos found that BPP scoring
4. Doppler examination:
Some people believe that an increased S/D ratio in umbilical blood flow indicates the presence of intrauterine infection. Flemming conducted daily umbilical blood flow S/D ratio tests and BPP checks on cases with premature rupture of membranes, and found that the S/D ratio of patients with chorioamnionitis was abnormal. If an increase of 15% in the S/D ratio is considered abnormal, the positive and negative predictive values of histological chorioamnionitis are 71% and 61% respectively. Yucal compared the relationship between the S/D ratio and placental pathological examination, and found that the proportion of elevated S/D ratios in patients with histological chorioamnionitis was twice as high as that in pregnant women without chorioamnionitis. However, some authors reported that the abnormality of the S/D ratio is not significantly related to chorioamnionitis. Therefore, the value of using the umbilical blood flow S/D ratio to diagnose intrauterine infection still needs further study.