First, Treatment
1. Vulvar Pigmented Lesions
It is not necessary to remove all vulvar pigmented lesions, especially benign moles, but biopsy is necessary when there is clinical suspicion of malignancy or the presence of malignant tumors. All congenital moles, junctional moles, and atypical hyperplastic moles should be removed. Lesions with a diameter greater than 5 mm, irregular and unclear boundaries, and spots-like pigmented lesions should be considered for removal. In addition, pigmented lesions that increase in size, deepen in color, produce irritative symptoms, or show ulceration and bleeding should be removed. Atypical moles with a family history or history of melanoma and/or other similar medical histories should be followed up under the strict supervision of a dermatological oncologist.
2. Surgical Treatment
(1) Surgical Approach: The management of vulvar melanoma is a balance, aiming to achieve local disease control while reducing the cure rate; it is not necessarily better to have a larger surgical range. The conventional treatment method for vulvar melanoma is similar to that for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma, which involves the performance of radical vulvectomy along with bilateral inguinal lymph node and pelvic lymphadenectomy. With the trend of individualization in the treatment of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and the shrinking of surgical ranges and more conservative treatment of melanoma in other skin sites, the surgical management concept of vulvar melanoma has also changed. In 1987, Davidson et al. reported on 32 cases of vulvar melanoma and vaginal melanoma patients, and there was no difference in therapeutic outcomes whether radical surgery, simple vulvectomy, or simple local resection was performed, or whether radiotherapy was used as an adjuvant. The radical surgery adopted by the authors included simple radical vulvectomy, radical vulvectomy with inguinal lymph node dissection, or anterior pelvic exenteration. Therefore, the authors suggested local resection. If there is clinical evidence of metastasis to the inguinal lymph nodes, then the inguinal lymph node dissection should be added. For giant vulvar lesions or those with extensive local recurrence, radical surgery should be considered. Subsequent multicenter clinical studies have also not confirmed that extensive surgery is superior to local resection with margins of 2 cm. Verschraegen and his colleagues summarized the treatment of 51 cases of vulvar melanoma admitted between 1970 and 1997 in 2001, and found that the surgical technique itself did not change the prognosis of the patients.
(2) Surgical margin: Whether the surgical margin is thorough is significantly related to the recurrence of the disease and the prognosis of the patient. Rose et al. found that among 6 patients undergoing conservative treatment, only 1 patient recurred with a 2cm margin. Trimble and his colleagues summarized the treatment effects of 80 cases of vulvar melanoma patients and found that compared with incomplete radical surgery, radical surgery does not seem to improve the prognosis of the patients. It is recommended that for thin lesions with Chung II stage and invasion depth ≤1mm, perform a local radical resection with a margin of 1-2cm. For thick lesions of Chung III and IV stages, the margin requirement is 3cm. For Chung I stage, simple resection and close follow-up are sufficient. To prevent recurrence, even
Based on the above research, thickness
(3) Treatment of regional lymph nodes: GOG analyzed 71 cases of vulvar melanoma and found that FIGO staging, tumor size, tumor location, involvement of capillary-lymphatic vessels, and Breslow's tumor invasion depth were significantly related to lymph node metastasis. Lymph node metastasis means that the prognosis of the patient is extremely poor. From a large-scale study of skin melanoma, it was found that patients with a depth of 4.0mm of skin lesions have a very high risk of lymph node metastasis and recurrence. Similarly, it is almost impossible to benefit from lymph node resection surgery. For patients with primary tumor depth of 0.76-4.0mm, they may benefit from selective lymph node resection. It is not necessary to perform selective lymph node resection for all vulvar melanoma patients. Chung believes that patients with Chung II stage (tumor thickness ≤1mm) do not need lymph node resection. Trimple and others suggest that patients with lesion thickness >0.76mm (Clark III) should undergo prophylactic lymph node resection because patients with positive lymph nodes can achieve long-term survival. For patients with micro-metastasis of lymph nodes, prophylactic lymph node resection and vulvar radical surgery can make the 10-year survival rate reach 31%. A prospective study by Phillips et al. on vulvar melanoma lymph node resection and types of surgery showed that compared with those who did not undergo lymph node resection, positive lymph node resection or negative lymph node resection did not show the advantages of lymph node resection treatment. In summary, for vulvar melanoma patients with invasion depth >0.76mm (Clark III), patients with lateral lesions should consider undergoing ipsilateral lymph node resection, and patients with central lesions should undergo bilateral lymph node resection. Removing clinically involved lymph nodes is always beneficial to vulvar melanoma patients.
3. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy
It was previously believed that melanoma was tolerant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but recent data shows that advanced patients respond well to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone have led to survival of some patients for more than 10 years in advanced patients. Common chemotherapy drugs include dacarbazine (thiotepa), lomustine (chloroethyl cyclohexyl nitrosourea), cisplatin (DDP), vinblastine sulfate (vincristine), and vincristine (VCR), among others. The most effective chemotherapy drug for melanoma is dacarbazine (DTIC), with a response rate of 15%-25%. Only 1%-2% of patients receiving dacarbazine (DTIC) treatment achieve long-term complete remission. Common regimens include DVP (dacarbazine, vincristine, cisplatin), CPD (lomustine, procarbazine, actinomycin D), BDPT (carmustine, dacarbazine, cisplatin, tamoxifen), and VCD regimen.
BDPT regimen:
Carmustine (BCNU): 150mg/㎡ intravenous infusion on the 1st day, once every 6-8 weeks.
Dacarbazine (DTIC): 200-220mg/㎡ intravenous infusion on the 1st to 3rd day, once every 3-4 weeks.
Cisplatin (DDP): 25mg/㎡ intravenous infusion on the 1st to 3rd day, once every 3-4 weeks.
Tamoxifen: 10mg, twice a day, orally, 6-8 weeks as a course.
Cisplatin (DDP): 20mg/㎡ intravenous infusion on days 1-4.
Vinblastine sulfate (VLB): 1.5mg/㎡ intravenous infusion on days 1-4.
Dacarbazine (DTIC): 200mg/㎡ intravenous infusion on days 1-4, or 800mg/㎡, intravenous infusion on day 1.
3-4 weeks constitute one course of treatment.
External irradiation can be used locally in the vulvar and inguinal regions. For patients with tumor involvement of the vagina or recurrence in the vagina, vaginal brachytherapy can be used. The radiation dose is 4000cGY to 5000cGY. For high-risk patients, the main purpose is to improve local control. Radiotherapy can also be used for distant metastases to the brain, bones, and internal organs, playing a role in palliative treatment. Whether used conventionally or as a means of palliative treatment, radiotherapy can only alleviate the symptoms of vulvar melanoma in advanced patients and cannot achieve a cure for the disease.
4. Immunotherapy
(1) Interferon α: ECOGG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) evaluated 280 patients with stage IIIB or III or with regional lymph node metastasis, 137 cases as controls, and 143 cases received interferon treatment. The method is: interferon 20MU/(㎡·d), intravenous administration, 5 times a week, for 4 weeks, then changed to 10MU/(㎡·d), subcutaneous injection, 3 times a week, for a total of 48 weeks. The results showed that the survival time without recurrence and the overall survival time in the treatment group were significantly prolonged. The beneficiaries of interferon treatment are those patients with lymph node involvement. Further in-depth research by ECOG found that high-dose interferon can significantly prolong the survival time without tumor recurrence and the overall survival time for patients with high-risk melanoma after surgery, which is unparalleled by any other drug, cytokines, and other forms of vaccines.
(2) Vaccine: Melanoma is the most immunogenic tumor, and therefore melanoma is used as the main model for tumor vaccine treatment research. The IgM and IgG globulins in the serum of melanoma patients can produce heterologous reactions to autologous and allogeneic melanoma, about 1/3 of the patients have the phenomenon of lymph node concentration in the tumor nodules. The freeze-dried BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, tuberculin) has the effect of enhancing the phagocytic power of the reticuloendothelial system. The skin scratch method of freeze-dried BCG (BCG) can be used, with each dose of 75-150mg, an area of 7cm×8cm. China has reported 15 cases of the therapeutic effect of melanoma in the genital tract, and it was found that all patients who survived for more than 1 year underwent surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy with freeze-dried BCG (BCG), with good results. With the development of molecular biology technology, some genes encoding specific melanoma antigens have been cloned, and specific antigen polypeptide molecules have been identified. Utilizing specific antigens can stimulate the body to produce specific active immune responses. A new type of specific anti-melanoma vaccine with strong specificity has been developed. In 1998, Piura reported a case of a 25-year-old patient with primary vulvar melanoma of Clark IV grade. After surgery, the patient received adjuvant treatment with allogeneic specific anti-melanoma vaccine, achieving long-term remission and survival for more than 5 years, opening up a new era for active immunotherapy of vulvar melanoma.
(3) Adalimumab (Interleukin-2): Currently, there is no consensus on the therapeutic dose and administration time for the use of interleukin-2 alone. Although treatment regimens combining interleukin with chemotherapy and/or interferon achieve a high rate of response, they cannot achieve good long-term survival.
Two, prognosis
1. General prognosis judgment The recurrence rate of vulvar melanoma is 51% to 93%, with the most common site of recurrence being the vulva, followed by the vagina, and then the inguinal area. 37% to 40% of cases show distant metastasis, with the most common sites of metastasis being the lung, bone, liver, brain. 29% of recurrent patients have multiple lesions, with an average recurrence time of 1 year. Most patients die from distant metastasis. The prognosis is poor after recurrence, with an average survival of 5.9 months and a 5-year survival rate of 5%.
(1) Age and prognosis: Age is a significant independent prognostic factor for the survival of patients with vulvar melanoma. Older patients have a worse prognosis, with a risk coefficient for the impact of age on survival of 1.4 per 10 years. The GOG prospective study found that elderly patients will significantly increase the risk of disease recurrence, with an increase rate of 26% per 10 years, and an average age of over 67 years, where tumors are more likely to show vascular invasion, surface ulceration, aneuploidy, and tumor thickness greater than 5mm.
(2) Lesion location and prognosis: Tumors located centrally have a significantly worse prognosis than those located on the sides. Primary tumors in the central location have a higher risk of lymph node involvement and recurrence compared to those on the lateral side, and the survival time of patients with tumors on the lateral side is significantly longer than those on the clitoris or with multiple lesions.
(3) Growth pattern and cell type and prognosis: The order of worsening prognosis by growth pattern is superficial spreading, mixed, lentigo, nodular, undifferentiated, and by cell type is fascicular, epithelial, mixed, and pleomorphic.
(4) Mitotic rate and prognosis: A higher mitotic rate is associated with a shorter survival period.
(5) Lymphovascular invasion and prognosis: The survival rate is reduced in patients with lymphovascular invasion.
(6) Tumor size and prognosis: The prognosis is worse for patients with a tumor diameter greater than 2cm.
(7) Lymph node metastasis and prognosis: The survival rate of patients with lymph node metastasis is significantly reduced, with a 5-year survival rate of 0 reported by Scheistroen, compared to 56% for those without metastasis. Lymph node metastasis is associated with tumor vascular invasion, surface ulceration, aneuploidy, thickness greater than 5mm, and age greater than 67 years.
(8) FIGO staging and AJCC staging and prognosis: Patients with FIGO I and II stages have significantly better prognoses than those with III and IV stages. Scheistroen reported that the 5-year survival rates for stages I, II, III, and IV were 63.2%, 44.2%, 0, and 0, respectively, and the 10-year survival rates were 51.6%, 35.4%, 0, and 0, respectively. The GOG prospective study reported that the 5-year survival rate of AJCC I stage patients was 85%, stage II was 40%, stage III was 25%, and it was believed that the AJCC staging system is related to the recurrence time of the disease. The AJCC staging system is more accurate in predicting the outcome of the disease than the FIGO staging system. The AJCC staging can determine prognosis and treatment selection. It is recommended that vulvar melanoma adopt the AJCC staging system. Recently, Verschraegen reported 51 cases of vulvar melanoma, with 29% in stage I, 50% in stage II, 16% in stage III, and 7% in stage IV. The 5-year survival rate of stage I was 91%, and ≥IIA was 31% (P=0.0002). The AJCC staging is a major prognostic indicator related to patient overall survival and tumor-free survival, with P=0.0001 and P≤0.0001, respectively.
(9) Tumor surface ulcer formation and prognosis: Ulcer formation represents rapid tumor progression and is an important prognostic indicator for tumor-free survival, long-term survival, and recurrence. The 5-year survival rate of patients with ulcer formation is 14.3% to 40.5%, while the 5-year survival rate of patients without ulcer formation is 20% to 62.7%.
(10) Tumor thickness and invasion depth: The Chung and Clark grading system represents the degree of tumor invasion, while the Breslow grading system represents the tumor thickness. Clinical studies by many scholars have proven to varying degrees that these three microscopic staging systems are all related to the prognosis of tumors. The Chung and Breslow grading systems are more accurate in predicting the prognosis of the disease than the Clark grading system. Trimble applied the Chung and Breslow microscopic grading system to analyze 65 cases of vulvar melanoma, of which 47 were consistent with the Chung staging, including 1 case in stage I, 12 cases in stage II, 8 cases in stage III, 20 cases in stage IV, and 6 cases in stage V. The 5-year survival rates of each stage were 100%, 81%, 87%, 4%, and 17%, respectively, and the 10-year survival rates were 100%, 81%, 87%, 11%, and 33%, respectively. 65 cases were consistent with the Breslow staging, including 12 cases in stage I, 10 cases in stage II, 9 cases in stages III and IV combined, and 34 cases in stage V. The corresponding 5-year survival rates were 48%, 79%, 56%, 44%, respectively. Therefore, the authors believe that the Chung microscopic staging system can better reflect the survival, lymph node metastasis, and outcome of vulvar melanoma than the Breslow system. The GOG believes that the AJCC system is the best system to reflect the outcome of vulvar melanoma. In the absence of the ACJJ staging system, the Breslow grading system will be the best grading system.
2. Some molecular biological studies on melanoma have shown that the flow cytometry karyotype detection of non-chromosome aneuploidy is an indicator of poor prognosis for the disease. Scheistroen et al. used flow cytometry to perform karyotype detection on the paraffin-embedded tissue of 75 melanoma cases, and found that the 5-year survival rates of diploid, tetraploid, aneuploid, and patients who could not be evaluated were 60.9%, 44.4%, 32.5%, and 71.4%, respectively; the 10-year survival rates were 60.9%, 44.4%, 23.2%, and 42.0%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the survival rate statistics between the chromosome aneuploidy (P=0.0101). Multivariate analysis showed that in the patients treated with surgery, DNA aneuploidy was an independent prognostic factor for tumor-free and long-term survival. Among the prognostic indicators for tumor-free survival, the prediction of DNA aneuploidy was inferior to vascular invasion and age at first visit. In terms of predicting long-term survival, DNA aneuploidy was second only to the location of tumor growth. Haploid tumors have the best prognosis, and aneuploid tumors have a higher risk of recurrence and poorer prognosis.